Hauk vs deck.gl
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Hauk
Self-hosted real-time location sharing service
VS
deck.gl
WebGL-powered framework for large-scale data visualization on maps
| Feature | Hauk | deck.gl |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Java | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 924 | ★ 14,360 |
| First released | 2019 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Google Maps location sharing | Mapbox visualization, ArcGIS |
Why pick each one
Choose Hauk if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Java
Choose deck.gl if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 14.4k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Hauk or deck.gl better?
Neither is universally better. deck.gl has the larger community, while Hauk is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Hauk and deck.gl free and open-source?
Yes. Hauk is licensed under Apache-2.0 and deck.gl under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Hauk and deck.gl with Docker?
Hauk: yes. deck.gl: check the project docs for container support.