HAProxy vs Kong Gateway

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureHAProxyKong Gateway
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseGPL-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageCLua
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 6,760★ 43,947
First released20012015
ReplacesF5 BIG-IP, AWS ELBAWS API Gateway, Apigee

Why pick each one

Choose HAProxy if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 6.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in C
HAProxy details

Choose Kong Gateway if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 43.9k GitHub stars
Kong Gateway details

Frequently asked questions

Is HAProxy or Kong Gateway better?

Kong Gateway is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider HAProxy if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are HAProxy and Kong Gateway free and open-source?

Yes. HAProxy is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Kong Gateway under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run HAProxy and Kong Gateway with Docker?

HAProxy: yes. Kong Gateway: yes.

Related comparisons