Navitia vs kepler.gl
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Navitia
Open-source journey planner for public transit
VS
kepler.gl
Open-source geospatial data visualization tool
| Feature | Navitia | kepler.gl |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 454 | ★ 11,954 |
| First released | 2014 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Google Transit, Citymapper API | Tableau, ArcGIS |
Why pick each one
Choose Navitia if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Choose kepler.gl if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 12k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Navitia or kepler.gl better?
kepler.gl is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Navitia if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Navitia and kepler.gl free and open-source?
Yes. Navitia is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and kepler.gl under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Navitia and kepler.gl with Docker?
Navitia: yes. kepler.gl: check the project docs for container support.