Navitia vs deck.gl
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Navitia
Open-source journey planner for public transit
VS
deck.gl
WebGL-powered framework for large-scale data visualization on maps
| Feature | Navitia | deck.gl |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 454 | ★ 14,360 |
| First released | 2014 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Google Transit, Citymapper API | Mapbox visualization, ArcGIS |
Why pick each one
Choose Navitia if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Choose deck.gl if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 14.4k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Navitia or deck.gl better?
deck.gl is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Navitia if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Navitia and deck.gl free and open-source?
Yes. Navitia is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and deck.gl under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Navitia and deck.gl with Docker?
Navitia: yes. deck.gl: check the project docs for container support.