Grav vs Piranha CMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Grav
Fast flat-file CMS with no database required
VS
Piranha CMS
Lightweight, cross-platform CMS for ASP.NET Core
| Feature | Grav | Piranha CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | PHP | C# |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 15,620 | ★ 2,188 |
| First released | 2014 | 2011 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Squarespace | WordPress, Umbraco |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Grav or Piranha CMS better?
Grav is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Piranha CMS if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Grav and Piranha CMS free and open-source?
Yes. Grav is licensed under MIT and Piranha CMS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Grav and Piranha CMS with Docker?
Grav: yes. Piranha CMS: yes.