Grav vs Pagekit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Grav
Fast flat-file CMS with no database required
VS
Pagekit
Modular and lightweight CMS with a modern interface
| Feature | Grav | Pagekit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 15,620 | ★ 5,457 |
| First released | 2014 | 2014 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Squarespace | WordPress |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Grav or Pagekit better?
Neither is universally better. Grav has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Grav and Pagekit free and open-source?
Yes. Grav is licensed under MIT and Pagekit under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Grav and Pagekit with Docker?
Grav: yes. Pagekit: yes.