GraphHopper vs TileServer GL

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGraphHopperTileServer GL
CategoryMaps & GISMaps & GIS
LicenseApache-2.0BSD-2-Clause
LanguageJavaJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM4,096 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarydocker, bare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 6,619★ 2,872
First released20122016
ReplacesGoogle Directions APIMapbox

Why pick each one

Choose GraphHopper if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 6.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in Java
GraphHopper details

Choose TileServer GL if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
TileServer GL details

Frequently asked questions

Is GraphHopper or TileServer GL better?

Neither is universally better. GraphHopper has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are GraphHopper and TileServer GL free and open-source?

Yes. GraphHopper is licensed under Apache-2.0 and TileServer GL under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run GraphHopper and TileServer GL with Docker?

GraphHopper: yes. TileServer GL: yes.

Related comparisons