GeoServer vs GraphHopper
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GeoServer
Server for sharing and editing geospatial data
VS
GraphHopper
Fast and flexible open-source routing engine
| Feature | GeoServer | GraphHopper |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Java | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,428 | ★ 6,619 |
| First released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Replaces | ArcGIS Server | Google Directions API |
Why pick each one
Choose GeoServer if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Java
Choose GraphHopper if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 6.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Java
Frequently asked questions
Is GeoServer or GraphHopper better?
Neither is universally better. GraphHopper has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are GeoServer and GraphHopper free and open-source?
Yes. GeoServer is licensed under GPL-2.0 and GraphHopper under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GeoServer and GraphHopper with Docker?
GeoServer: yes. GraphHopper: yes.