Geo2tz vs GraphHopper

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGeo2tzGraphHopper
CategoryMaps & GISMaps & GIS
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageGoJava
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB4,096 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, bare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 97★ 6,619
First released20262012
ReplacesGoogle Directions API

Why pick each one

Choose Geo2tz if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Go
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Geo2tz details

Choose GraphHopper if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 6.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in Java
GraphHopper details

Frequently asked questions

Is Geo2tz or GraphHopper better?

Neither is universally better. GraphHopper has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Geo2tz and GraphHopper free and open-source?

Yes. Geo2tz is licensed under MIT and GraphHopper under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Geo2tz and GraphHopper with Docker?

Geo2tz: yes. GraphHopper: yes.

Related comparisons