Geo2tz vs kepler.gl

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGeo2tzkepler.gl
CategoryMaps & GISMaps & GIS
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerbare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 97★ 11,954
First released20262018
ReplacesTableau, ArcGIS

Why pick each one

Choose Geo2tz if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Go
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Geo2tz details

Choose kepler.gl if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Mature project with 12k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
kepler.gl details

Frequently asked questions

Is Geo2tz or kepler.gl better?

Neither is universally better. kepler.gl has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Geo2tz and kepler.gl free and open-source?

Yes. Geo2tz is licensed under MIT and kepler.gl under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Geo2tz and kepler.gl with Docker?

Geo2tz: yes. kepler.gl: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons