Grafana k6 vs Shinken

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana k6Shinken
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, bare-metalbare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 31,211★ 1,136
First released20172009
ReplacesLoadRunner, BlazeMeterSolarWinds

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana k6 if…

  • Developer-friendly scripting
  • Great CI integration
Grafana k6 details

Choose Shinken if…

  • Scales horizontally
  • Reuses Nagios ecosystem
Shinken details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana k6 or Shinken better?

Grafana k6 is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Shinken if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Grafana k6 and Shinken free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana k6 is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Shinken under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana k6 and Shinken with Docker?

Grafana k6: yes. Shinken: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons