Cacti vs Shinken
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Cacti | Shinken |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 85 · Excellent | 17 · At risk |
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker, source | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,871 | ★ 1,135 |
| First released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Replaces | PRTG, SolarWinds | SolarWinds |
What are Cacti and Shinken?
Cacti
Cacti is a complete network graphing solution that harnesses RRDtool for data storage and graphing. It polls devices over SNMP and scripts, presenting historical performance data through a web interface.
- RRDtool-based graphing
- SNMP and script polling
- Plugin architecture
- Templating for devices
Shinken
Shinken is a monitoring framework written in Python and compatible with Nagios configurations and plugins. Its distributed architecture splits monitoring into specialized, scalable daemons.
- Nagios configuration compatibility
- Distributed daemon architecture
- Scales across many pollers
- Plugin support
Cacti vs Shinken: key differences
Cacti is written in PHP, while Shinken is built with Python. Licensing differs — GPL-2.0 for Cacti versus AGPL-3.0 for Shinken. Cacti is the more established project (first released 2001), while Shinken arrived in 2009. Cacti lists first-class Docker deployment; Shinken does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Cacti if…
- Mature and reliable
- Detailed graph templates
Watch out for
- Dated interface
- Configuration can be tedious
Choose Shinken if…
- Scales horizontally
- Reuses Nagios ecosystem
Watch out for
- Development has slowed
- Complex setup
Frequently asked questions
Is Cacti or Shinken better?
Cacti is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Shinken if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Cacti and Shinken free and open-source?
Yes. Cacti is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Shinken under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cacti and Shinken with Docker?
Cacti: yes. Shinken: check the project docs for container support.