Grafana Faro vs Uptime Kuma

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana FaroUptime Kuma
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetesdocker
GitHub stars★ 1,118★ 89,960
First released20222021
ReplacesSentry, LogRocketPingdom, UptimeRobot

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana Faro if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Active community (1.1k GitHub stars)
Grafana Faro details

Choose Uptime Kuma if…

  • Very easy to use
  • Great notifications
  • Lightweight
Uptime Kuma details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Faro or Uptime Kuma better?

Uptime Kuma is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Grafana Faro if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Grafana Faro and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana Faro is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana Faro and Uptime Kuma with Docker?

Grafana Faro: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.

Related comparisons