SHSelfHostIndex

closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
C closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin Global name system for secure file sharing VS PU Puter Web-based operating system designed to be feature-rich, exceptionally
Feature closet GoToSocial NoNo upspinPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseAGPL-3.0
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 6,396★ 43,003
First released20162026
ReplacesDropbox—

Why pick each one

Choose closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Mature project with 6.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin or Puter better?

Puter is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin and Puter with Docker?

closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin: check the project docs for container support. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons