GitBucket vs Gitiles
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GitBucket
Git platform powered by Scala with GitHub-like UI
VS
Gitiles
Simple repository browser for Git repositories
| Feature | GitBucket | Gitiles |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Git Hosting & Forges | Developer Tools & Git |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Scala | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,387 | ★ 600 |
| First released | 2013 | 2013 |
| Replaces | GitHub | GitHub |
Why pick each one
Choose GitBucket if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 9.4k GitHub stars
Choose Gitiles if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Written in Java
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is GitBucket or Gitiles better?
GitBucket is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Gitiles if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are GitBucket and Gitiles free and open-source?
Yes. GitBucket is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Gitiles under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GitBucket and Gitiles with Docker?
GitBucket: yes. Gitiles: check the project docs for container support.