GitBucket vs OneDev
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted git hosting & forges options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GitBucket
Git platform powered by Scala with GitHub-like UI
VS
OneDev
Self-hosted Git server with CI/CD and kanban
| Feature | GitBucket | OneDev |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Git Hosting & Forges | Git Hosting & Forges |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Scala | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,387 | ★ 15,145 |
| First released | 2013 | 2016 |
| Replaces | GitHub | GitHub, GitLab |
Why pick each one
Choose GitBucket if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 9.4k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is GitBucket or OneDev better?
Neither is universally better. OneDev has the larger community, while GitBucket is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are GitBucket and OneDev free and open-source?
Yes. GitBucket is licensed under Apache-2.0 and OneDev under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GitBucket and OneDev with Docker?
GitBucket: yes. OneDev: yes.