Forgejo vs GitBucket
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted git hosting & forges options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Forgejo
Community-driven self-hosted software forge
VS
GitBucket
Git platform powered by Scala with GitHub-like UI
| Feature | Forgejo | GitBucket |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Git Hosting & Forges | Git Hosting & Forges |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Scala |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,000 | ★ 9,387 |
| First released | 2022 | 2013 |
| Replaces | GitHub, GitLab | GitHub |
Why pick each one
Choose GitBucket if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 9.4k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Forgejo or GitBucket better?
Neither is universally better. GitBucket has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Forgejo and GitBucket free and open-source?
Yes. Forgejo is licensed under GPL-3.0 and GitBucket under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Forgejo and GitBucket with Docker?
Forgejo: yes. GitBucket: yes.