Agola vs GitBucket
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted git hosting & forges options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Agola
CI/CD redefined for cloud-native workflows
VS
GitBucket
Git platform powered by Scala with GitHub-like UI
| Feature | Agola | GitBucket |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Git Hosting & Forges | Git Hosting & Forges |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Scala |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,622 | ★ 9,387 |
| First released | 2019 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Drone, GitHub Actions | GitHub |
Why pick each one
Choose Agola if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
Choose GitBucket if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 9.4k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Agola or GitBucket better?
GitBucket is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Agola if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Agola and GitBucket free and open-source?
Yes. Agola is licensed under Apache-2.0 and GitBucket under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Agola and GitBucket with Docker?
Agola: yes. GitBucket: yes.