git-bug vs Rukovoditel
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | git-bug | Rukovoditel |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Read-the-docs project | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 93 · Excellent | 0 · At risk |
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,061 | ★ 29 |
| First released | 2018 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Jira, GitHub Issues | Jira, Salesforce |
What are git-bug and Rukovoditel?
git-bug
git-bug is a distributed, offline-first bug tracker that stores issues as objects inside the Git repository itself, so tickets travel with the code. It can bridge to GitHub and GitLab issues for synchronization.
- Issues stored in Git
- Offline-first workflow
- Bridges to GitHub and GitLab
- CLI, TUI, and web UI
Rukovoditel
Rukovoditel is a free, open-source web-based project management and CRM application. It is highly customizable, letting users build their own entities and workflows.
- Customizable entities
- Project and task management
- Built-in reporting
- Access control rules
git-bug vs Rukovoditel: key differences
Git-bug is written in Go, while Rukovoditel is built with PHP. Git-bug is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Rukovoditel. Rukovoditel is the more established project (first released 2012), while git-bug arrived in 2018. Git-bug has the considerably larger community, at 10,061 GitHub stars versus 29.
Why pick each one
Choose git-bug if…
- No separate server needed
- Issues travel with code
Watch out for
- Unconventional model
- Less collaboration tooling
Choose Rukovoditel if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is git-bug or Rukovoditel better?
Neither is universally better. git-bug has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are git-bug and Rukovoditel free and open-source?
Yes. git-bug is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Rukovoditel under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run git-bug and Rukovoditel with Docker?
git-bug: check the project docs for container support. Rukovoditel: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, git-bug or Rukovoditel?
git-bug has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Rukovoditel. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.