FlowInquiry vs git-bug
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
FlowInquiry
Archived
Project management and ticket tracking with SLA monitoring
VS
git-bug
Distributed bug tracker embedded directly in Git
| Feature | FlowInquiry | git-bug |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 15 · At risk | 93 · Excellent |
| Status | Archived | Actively maintained |
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | HTML | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 221 | ★ 10,061 |
| First released | 2024 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Jira, Zendesk | Jira, GitHub Issues |
What are FlowInquiry and git-bug?
FlowInquiry
FlowInquiry is an open-source platform that combines project management, ticket tracking, workflow automation, and SLA monitoring. Teams organize work with kanban boards, epics, and iterations following agile practices.
- Kanban boards, epics, and iterations
- Workflow automation
- SLA compliance monitoring
- Email, Slack, and GitHub integrations
git-bug
git-bug is a distributed, offline-first bug tracker that stores issues as objects inside the Git repository itself, so tickets travel with the code. It can bridge to GitHub and GitLab issues for synchronization.
- Issues stored in Git
- Offline-first workflow
- Bridges to GitHub and GitLab
- CLI, TUI, and web UI
FlowInquiry vs git-bug: key differences
The biggest difference is maintenance: FlowInquiry's repository is archived and no longer developed, while git-bug is actively maintained. FlowInquiry is written in HTML, while git-bug is built with Go. Licensing differs — AGPL-3.0 for FlowInquiry versus GPL-3.0 for git-bug. Git-bug is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 1,024 MB for FlowInquiry. Git-bug is the more established project (first released 2018), while FlowInquiry arrived in 2024. Git-bug has the considerably larger community, at 10,061 GitHub stars versus 221. FlowInquiry lists first-class Docker deployment; git-bug does not.
Why pick each one
Choose FlowInquiry if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Written in HTML
Choose git-bug if…
- No separate server needed
- Issues travel with code
Watch out for
- Unconventional model
- Less collaboration tooling
Frequently asked questions
Is FlowInquiry or git-bug better?
git-bug is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider FlowInquiry if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are FlowInquiry and git-bug free and open-source?
Yes. FlowInquiry is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and git-bug under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FlowInquiry and git-bug with Docker?
FlowInquiry: yes. git-bug: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, FlowInquiry or git-bug?
git-bug has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 1,024 MB for FlowInquiry. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.