FlowInquiry vs Rukovoditel
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
FlowInquiry
Archived
Project management and ticket tracking with SLA monitoring
VS
Rukovoditel
Web-based project management and CRM builder
| Feature | FlowInquiry | Rukovoditel |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 15 · At risk | 0 · At risk |
| Status | Archived | Actively maintained |
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | HTML | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 221 | ★ 29 |
| First released | 2024 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Jira, Zendesk | Jira, Salesforce |
What are FlowInquiry and Rukovoditel?
FlowInquiry
FlowInquiry is an open-source platform that combines project management, ticket tracking, workflow automation, and SLA monitoring. Teams organize work with kanban boards, epics, and iterations following agile practices.
- Kanban boards, epics, and iterations
- Workflow automation
- SLA compliance monitoring
- Email, Slack, and GitHub integrations
Rukovoditel
Rukovoditel is a free, open-source web-based project management and CRM application. It is highly customizable, letting users build their own entities and workflows.
- Customizable entities
- Project and task management
- Built-in reporting
- Access control rules
FlowInquiry vs Rukovoditel: key differences
The biggest difference is maintenance: FlowInquiry's repository is archived and no longer developed, while Rukovoditel is actively maintained. FlowInquiry is written in HTML, while Rukovoditel is built with PHP. Licensing differs — AGPL-3.0 for FlowInquiry versus GPL-3.0 for Rukovoditel. Rukovoditel is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 1,024 MB for FlowInquiry. Rukovoditel is the more established project (first released 2012), while FlowInquiry arrived in 2024. FlowInquiry has the considerably larger community, at 221 GitHub stars versus 29. FlowInquiry lists first-class Docker deployment; Rukovoditel does not.
Why pick each one
Choose FlowInquiry if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Written in HTML
Choose Rukovoditel if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is FlowInquiry or Rukovoditel better?
Neither is universally better. FlowInquiry has the larger community, while Rukovoditel is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are FlowInquiry and Rukovoditel free and open-source?
Yes. FlowInquiry is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Rukovoditel under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FlowInquiry and Rukovoditel with Docker?
FlowInquiry: yes. Rukovoditel: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, FlowInquiry or Rukovoditel?
Rukovoditel has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 1,024 MB for FlowInquiry. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.