FlowInquiry vs Rukovoditel
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FlowInquiry
Project management and ticket tracking with SLA monitoring
VS
Rukovoditel
Web-based project management and CRM builder
| Feature | FlowInquiry | Rukovoditel |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | HTML | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 170 | ★ 29 |
| First released | 2024 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Jira, Zendesk | Jira, Salesforce |
Why pick each one
Choose FlowInquiry if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Written in HTML
Choose Rukovoditel if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is FlowInquiry or Rukovoditel better?
Neither is universally better. FlowInquiry has the larger community, while Rukovoditel is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are FlowInquiry and Rukovoditel free and open-source?
Yes. FlowInquiry is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Rukovoditel under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FlowInquiry and Rukovoditel with Docker?
FlowInquiry: yes. Rukovoditel: check the project docs for container support.