Gamja vs Chatwoot

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGamjaChatwoot
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageJavaScriptRuby
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM32 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker, kubernetes, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 400★ 35,596
First released20202019
ReplacesIRCCloudIntercom, Zendesk, Drift

Why pick each one

Choose Gamja if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 32 MB RAM
Gamja details

Choose Chatwoot if…

  • Polished customer support workflow
  • Active development
Chatwoot details

Frequently asked questions

Is Gamja or Chatwoot better?

Neither is universally better. Chatwoot has the larger community, while Gamja is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Gamja and Chatwoot free and open-source?

Yes. Gamja is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Chatwoot under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Gamja and Chatwoot with Docker?

Gamja: check the project docs for container support. Chatwoot: yes.

Related comparisons