gallery-dl vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featuregallery-dlSeaweedFS
CategoryPhoto ManagementFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binary, sourcedocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 19,143★ 33,952
First released20152015
ReplacesManual downloadsAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose gallery-dl if…

  • Supports hundreds of sites
  • Very actively maintained
gallery-dl details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is gallery-dl or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while gallery-dl is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are gallery-dl and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. gallery-dl is licensed under GPL-2.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run gallery-dl and SeaweedFS with Docker?

gallery-dl: check the project docs for container support. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons