gallery-dl vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featuregallery-dlPuter
CategoryPhoto ManagementFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binary, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 19,143★ 43,003
First released20152026
ReplacesManual downloads

Why pick each one

Choose gallery-dl if…

  • Supports hundreds of sites
  • Very actively maintained
gallery-dl details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is gallery-dl or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while gallery-dl is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are gallery-dl and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. gallery-dl is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run gallery-dl and Puter with Docker?

gallery-dl: check the project docs for container support. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons