Color Thief vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureColor ThiefPuter
CategoryPhoto ManagementFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 13,616★ 43,003
First released20112026
ReplacesCommercial color analysis APIs

Why pick each one

Choose Color Thief if…

  • Simple and reliable
  • Widely used
Color Thief details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Color Thief or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while Color Thief is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Color Thief and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. Color Thief is licensed under MIT and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Color Thief and Puter with Docker?

Color Thief: check the project docs for container support. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons