Funkwhale vs Tempo
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Funkwhale
Federated music streaming and sharing platform
VS
Tempo
Material You Subsonic music client for Android
| Feature | Funkwhale | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media Servers | Media Servers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,700 | ★ 2,220 |
| First released | 2017 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Spotify | Spotify, Plexamp |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Funkwhale or Tempo better?
Neither is universally better. Funkwhale has the larger community, while Tempo is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Funkwhale and Tempo free and open-source?
Yes. Funkwhale is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Tempo under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Funkwhale and Tempo with Docker?
Funkwhale: yes. Tempo: check the project docs for container support.