Ampache vs Funkwhale
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Ampache
Web-based audio and video streaming application
VS
Funkwhale
Federated music streaming and sharing platform
| Feature | Ampache | Funkwhale |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media Servers | Media Servers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,815 | ★ 2,700 |
| First released | 2001 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Spotify | Spotify |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Ampache or Funkwhale better?
Ampache is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Funkwhale if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Ampache and Funkwhale free and open-source?
Yes. Ampache is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Funkwhale under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Ampache and Funkwhale with Docker?
Ampache: yes. Funkwhale: yes.