frp-panel vs tunnelmole
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
frp-panel
Web management panel for the frp reverse proxy
VS
tunnelmole
Open-source tunnel to expose local servers to the internet
| Feature | frp-panel | tunnelmole |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | binary, docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,796 | ★ 1,885 |
| First released | 2023 | 2021 |
| Replaces | ngrok | ngrok, localtunnel |
Why pick each one
Choose frp-panel if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Choose tunnelmole if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is frp-panel or tunnelmole better?
tunnelmole is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider frp-panel if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are frp-panel and tunnelmole free and open-source?
Yes. frp-panel is licensed under Apache-2.0 and tunnelmole under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run frp-panel and tunnelmole with Docker?
frp-panel: yes. tunnelmole: yes.