Caddy vs frp-panel
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Caddy
Fast, multi-platform web server with automatic HTTPS
VS
frp-panel
Web management panel for the frp reverse proxy
| Feature | Caddy | frp-panel |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 74,748 | ★ 1,796 |
| First released | 2015 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Nginx, Apache | ngrok |
Why pick each one
Choose frp-panel if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Caddy or frp-panel better?
Caddy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider frp-panel if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Caddy and frp-panel free and open-source?
Yes. Caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and frp-panel under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Caddy and frp-panel with Docker?
Caddy: yes. frp-panel: yes.