Fork CMS vs Keystone
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Fork CMS
User-friendly CMS aimed at content editors
VS
Keystone
Headless CMS framework with a powerful GraphQL API
| Feature | Fork CMS | Keystone |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | PHP | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,172 | ★ 9,938 |
| First released | 2010 | 2013 |
| Replaces | WordPress | Contentful, Strapi |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Fork CMS or Keystone better?
Neither is universally better. Keystone has the larger community, while Fork CMS is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Fork CMS and Keystone free and open-source?
Yes. Fork CMS is licensed under MIT and Keystone under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Fork CMS and Keystone with Docker?
Fork CMS: yes. Keystone: yes.