Ghost vs Keystone

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGhostKeystone
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageJavaScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 54,707★ 9,938
First released20132013
ReplacesWordPress, Substack, MediumContentful, Strapi

Why pick each one

Choose Ghost if…

  • Excellent for newsletters and memberships
  • Clean, fast publishing experience
Ghost details

Choose Keystone if…

  • Strong TypeScript support
  • Flexible and extensible
Keystone details

Frequently asked questions

Is Ghost or Keystone better?

Neither is universally better. Ghost has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Ghost and Keystone free and open-source?

Yes. Ghost is licensed under MIT and Keystone under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Ghost and Keystone with Docker?

Ghost: yes. Keystone: yes.

Related comparisons