Grav vs Keystone

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGravKeystone
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseMITMIT
LanguagePHPTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 15,620★ 9,938
First released20142013
ReplacesWordPress, SquarespaceContentful, Strapi

Why pick each one

Choose Grav if…

  • Trivial to back up and migrate
  • Quick to set up
Grav details

Choose Keystone if…

  • Strong TypeScript support
  • Flexible and extensible
Keystone details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grav or Keystone better?

Grav is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Keystone if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Grav and Keystone free and open-source?

Yes. Grav is licensed under MIT and Keystone under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grav and Keystone with Docker?

Grav: yes. Keystone: yes.

Related comparisons