Flyte vs Mage
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Flyte
Kubernetes-native workflow orchestration for data and ML
VS
Mage
Open-source data pipeline tool for transforming and integrating data
| Feature | Flyte | Mage |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | kubernetes, helm | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,184 | ★ 8,789 |
| First released | 2019 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Apache Airflow | Azure Data Factory, Apache Airflow |
Why pick each one
Choose Flyte if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 7.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Flyte or Mage better?
Mage is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Flyte if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Flyte and Mage free and open-source?
Yes. Flyte is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Mage under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Flyte and Mage with Docker?
Flyte: check the project docs for container support. Mage: yes.