filite vs paaster
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
filite
Lightweight self-hosted store for files, links and pastes
VS
paaster
End-to-end encrypted pastebin built with the objective of simplicity
| Feature | filite | paaster |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Rust | Svelte |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 189 | ★ 558 |
| First released | 2019 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Imgur, Pastebin.com | — |
Why pick each one
Choose paaster if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Svelte
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is filite or paaster better?
Neither is universally better. paaster has the larger community, while filite is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are filite and paaster free and open-source?
Yes. filite is licensed under MIT and paaster under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run filite and paaster with Docker?
filite: yes. paaster: yes.