dpaste vs paaster
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
dpaste
Django-based pastebin for code and text snippets
VS
paaster
End-to-end encrypted pastebin built with the objective of simplicity
| Feature | dpaste | paaster |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Svelte |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 642 | ★ 558 |
| First released | 2011 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Pastebin.com, GitHub Gist | — |
Why pick each one
Choose dpaste if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Choose paaster if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Svelte
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is dpaste or paaster better?
dpaste is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider paaster if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are dpaste and paaster free and open-source?
Yes. dpaste is licensed under MIT and paaster under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run dpaste and paaster with Docker?
dpaste: yes. paaster: yes.