fiche vs paaster
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
fiche
Terminal pastebin server powered by netcat
VS
paaster
End-to-end encrypted pastebin built with the objective of simplicity
| Feature | fiche | paaster |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | C | Svelte |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,547 | ★ 558 |
| First released | 2015 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Pastebin.com, termbin | — |
Why pick each one
Choose fiche if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
Choose paaster if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Svelte
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is fiche or paaster better?
fiche is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider paaster if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are fiche and paaster free and open-source?
Yes. fiche is licensed under MIT and paaster under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run fiche and paaster with Docker?
fiche: check the project docs for container support. paaster: yes.