Filestash vs WebDAV Server Go
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Filestash
Web-based file manager and document gateway
VS
WebDAV Server Go
Lightweight standalone WebDAV file server
| Feature | Filestash | WebDAV Server Go |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | File Sync & Storage |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,451 | ★ 5,750 |
| First released | 2017 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, SharePoint | Dropbox |
Why pick each one
Choose WebDAV Server Go if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 5.8k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Filestash or WebDAV Server Go better?
Neither is universally better. Filestash has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Filestash and WebDAV Server Go free and open-source?
Yes. Filestash is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and WebDAV Server Go under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Filestash and WebDAV Server Go with Docker?
Filestash: yes. WebDAV Server Go: yes.