Filestash vs Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Filestash
Web-based file manager and document gateway
VS
Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware
All-in-one wiki, CMS, and groupware platform
| Feature | Filestash | Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Wikis & Documentation |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | LGPL-2.1 |
| Language | Go | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,451 | ★ 300 |
| First released | 2017 | 2002 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, SharePoint | Confluence, SharePoint |
Why pick each one
Choose Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware if…
- Everything included out of the box
- No add-ons needed for most needs
Frequently asked questions
Is Filestash or Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware better?
Filestash is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Filestash and Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware free and open-source?
Yes. Filestash is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware under LGPL-2.1. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Filestash and Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware with Docker?
Filestash: yes. Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware: yes.