Filestash vs SparkleShare
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Filestash
Web-based file manager and document gateway
VS
SparkleShare
Git-backed file synchronization with version history
| Feature | Filestash | SparkleShare |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | File Sync & Storage |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | C# |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,451 | ★ 4,971 |
| First released | 2017 | 2010 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, SharePoint | Dropbox |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Filestash or SparkleShare better?
Filestash is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider SparkleShare if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Filestash and SparkleShare free and open-source?
Yes. Filestash is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SparkleShare under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Filestash and SparkleShare with Docker?
Filestash: yes. SparkleShare: check the project docs for container support.