FilePizza vs Stalwart
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FilePizza
Peer-to-peer file transfers in your browser
VS
Stalwart
All-in-one Mail & Collaboration server
| Feature | FilePizza | Stalwart |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | free |
| Language | TypeScript | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, one-click |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,129 | ★ 14,059 |
| First released | 2023 | 2022 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | — |
Why pick each one
Choose FilePizza if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose Stalwart if…
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Mature project with 14.1k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is FilePizza or Stalwart better?
Stalwart is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider FilePizza if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are FilePizza and Stalwart free and open-source?
Yes. FilePizza is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Stalwart under free. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FilePizza and Stalwart with Docker?
FilePizza: check the project docs for container support. Stalwart: yes.