FileBrowser Quantum vs Spacedrive

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFileBrowser QuantumSpacedrive
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoRust
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary
GitHub stars★ 7,695★ 38,732
First released20242022
ReplacesGoogle Drive, DropboxGoogle Drive, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 7.7k GitHub stars
FileBrowser Quantum details

Choose Spacedrive if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 38.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in Rust
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Spacedrive details

Frequently asked questions

Is FileBrowser Quantum or Spacedrive better?

Neither is universally better. Spacedrive has the larger community, while FileBrowser Quantum is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are FileBrowser Quantum and Spacedrive free and open-source?

Yes. FileBrowser Quantum is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Spacedrive under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FileBrowser Quantum and Spacedrive with Docker?

FileBrowser Quantum: yes. Spacedrive: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons