Dufs vs Spacedrive

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDufsSpacedrive
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageRustRust
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM32 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary
GitHub stars★ 10,562★ 38,732
First released20222022
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveGoogle Drive, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose Dufs if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 10.6k GitHub stars
Dufs details

Choose Spacedrive if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 38.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in Rust
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Spacedrive details

Frequently asked questions

Is Dufs or Spacedrive better?

Neither is universally better. Spacedrive has the larger community, while Dufs is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Dufs and Spacedrive free and open-source?

Yes. Dufs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Spacedrive under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Dufs and Spacedrive with Docker?

Dufs: yes. Spacedrive: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons