FileBrowser Quantum vs MinIO

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFileBrowser QuantumMinIO
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 7,695★ 61,387
First released20242015
ReplacesGoogle Drive, DropboxAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 7.7k GitHub stars
FileBrowser Quantum details

Choose MinIO if…

  • Excellent performance
  • Drop-in S3 replacement
  • Scales horizontally
MinIO details

Frequently asked questions

Is FileBrowser Quantum or MinIO better?

Neither is universally better. MinIO has the larger community, while FileBrowser Quantum is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are FileBrowser Quantum and MinIO free and open-source?

Yes. FileBrowser Quantum is licensed under Apache-2.0 and MinIO under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FileBrowser Quantum and MinIO with Docker?

FileBrowser Quantum: yes. MinIO: yes.

Related comparisons