fgallery vs Zenphoto
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
fgallery
Minimalist static photo gallery generator
VS
Zenphoto
Open-source CMS for photo galleries and multimedia
| Feature | fgallery | Zenphoto |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 251 | ★ 319 |
| First released | 2013 | 2006 |
| Replaces | Flickr, Google Photos | SmugMug, Flickr |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is fgallery or Zenphoto better?
Neither is universally better. Zenphoto has the larger community, while fgallery is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are fgallery and Zenphoto free and open-source?
Yes. fgallery is licensed under MIT and Zenphoto under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run fgallery and Zenphoto with Docker?
fgallery: check the project docs for container support. Zenphoto: yes.