fgallery vs Photonix
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
fgallery
Minimalist static photo gallery generator
VS
Photonix
Self-hosted photo gallery with face and location detection
| Feature | fgallery | Photonix |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 251 | ★ 1,954 |
| First released | 2013 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Flickr, Google Photos | Google Photos |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is fgallery or Photonix better?
Neither is universally better. Photonix has the larger community, while fgallery is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are fgallery and Photonix free and open-source?
Yes. fgallery is licensed under MIT and Photonix under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run fgallery and Photonix with Docker?
fgallery: check the project docs for container support. Photonix: yes.