fgallery vs Nextcloud Photos
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
fgallery
Minimalist static photo gallery generator
VS
Nextcloud Photos
Photo timeline and album app for Nextcloud
| Feature | fgallery | Nextcloud Photos |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 251 | ★ 713 |
| First released | 2013 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Flickr, Google Photos | Google Photos, iCloud Photos |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is fgallery or Nextcloud Photos better?
Neither is universally better. Nextcloud Photos has the larger community, while fgallery is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are fgallery and Nextcloud Photos free and open-source?
Yes. fgallery is licensed under MIT and Nextcloud Photos under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run fgallery and Nextcloud Photos with Docker?
fgallery: check the project docs for container support. Nextcloud Photos: yes.
Related comparisons
- fgallery vs Friendiqa Hub
- fgallery vs Syncthing Android Wrapper
- Nextcloud Photos vs Syncthing Android Wrapper
- fgallery vs Chevereto
- fgallery vs Color Thief
- Nextcloud Photos vs Color Thief
- fgallery vs Coppermine
- fgallery vs Damselfly
- Nextcloud Photos vs Damselfly
- fgallery vs Shotwell Server
- Nextcloud Photos vs Shotwell Server