fgallery vs Nextcloud Photos
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | fgallery | Nextcloud Photos |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Read-the-docs project | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 9 · At risk | 76 · Good |
| Status | Archived | Actively maintained |
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 248 | ★ 721 |
| First released | 2013 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Flickr, Google Photos | Google Photos, iCloud Photos |
What are fgallery and Nextcloud Photos?
fgallery
fgallery is a static photo gallery generator that produces a minimalist, self-contained HTML gallery from a folder of images. The generated gallery is fully static, privacy-respecting, and can be hosted on any web server.
- Minimalist static galleries
- Self-contained output
- Mobile friendly
- No tracking
Nextcloud Photos
Nextcloud Photos is the official photo management app for Nextcloud, offering a timeline view, albums, and tagging of images stored in your Nextcloud. It works alongside file sync to provide a self-hosted photo experience.
- Timeline photo view
- Albums and tagging
- Nextcloud integration
- Mobile auto-upload
fgallery vs Nextcloud Photos: key differences
The biggest difference is maintenance: fgallery's repository is archived and no longer developed, while Nextcloud Photos is actively maintained. Both projects are written in JavaScript. Licensing differs — MIT for fgallery versus AGPL-3.0 for Nextcloud Photos. Fgallery is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 1,024 MB for Nextcloud Photos. Fgallery is the more established project (first released 2013), while Nextcloud Photos arrived in 2020. Nextcloud Photos has the considerably larger community, at 721 GitHub stars versus 248. Nextcloud Photos lists first-class Docker deployment; fgallery does not.
Why pick each one
Choose fgallery if…
- Clean simple design
- Privacy respecting
Watch out for
- Command-line only
- Minimal features
Choose Nextcloud Photos if…
- Leverages existing Nextcloud
- Official app
Watch out for
- Requires Nextcloud
- Fewer AI features than Memories
Frequently asked questions
Is fgallery or Nextcloud Photos better?
Neither is universally better. Nextcloud Photos has the larger community, while fgallery is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are fgallery and Nextcloud Photos free and open-source?
Yes. fgallery is licensed under MIT and Nextcloud Photos under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run fgallery and Nextcloud Photos with Docker?
fgallery: check the project docs for container support. Nextcloud Photos: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, fgallery or Nextcloud Photos?
fgallery has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 1,024 MB for Nextcloud Photos. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.
Related comparisons
- fgallery vs Chevereto
- fgallery vs Coppermine
- fgallery vs Damselfly
- Nextcloud Photos vs Damselfly
- fgallery vs Damselfly Web
- fgallery vs digiKam
- Nextcloud Photos vs digiKam
- fgallery vs Ente Photos
- Nextcloud Photos vs Ente Photos
- fgallery vs Google Photos Takeout Helper
- Nextcloud Photos vs Google Photos Takeout Helper