fgallery vs LibrePhotos
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
fgallery
Minimalist static photo gallery generator
VS
LibrePhotos
Self-hosted smart photo management
| Feature | fgallery | LibrePhotos |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 251 | ★ 8,021 |
| First released | 2013 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Flickr, Google Photos | Google Photos |
Why pick each one
Choose LibrePhotos if…
- Smart organization features
- Permissive license
- Privacy-friendly
Frequently asked questions
Is fgallery or LibrePhotos better?
Neither is universally better. LibrePhotos has the larger community, while fgallery is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are fgallery and LibrePhotos free and open-source?
Yes. fgallery is licensed under MIT and LibrePhotos under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run fgallery and LibrePhotos with Docker?
fgallery: check the project docs for container support. LibrePhotos: yes.