fgallery vs Immich
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
fgallery
Minimalist static photo gallery generator
VS
Immich
High-performance self-hosted photo and video backup
| Feature | fgallery | Immich |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 251 | ★ 109,945 |
| First released | 2013 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Flickr, Google Photos | Google Photos, iCloud Photos |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is fgallery or Immich better?
Neither is universally better. Immich has the larger community, while fgallery is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are fgallery and Immich free and open-source?
Yes. fgallery is licensed under MIT and Immich under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run fgallery and Immich with Docker?
fgallery: check the project docs for container support. Immich: yes.