Eternal Terminal vs frp
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Eternal Terminal
Remote terminal that survives network changes
VS
frp
Fast reverse proxy to expose local servers behind NAT
| Feature | Eternal Terminal | frp |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C++ | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary | binary, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,839 | ★ 108,622 |
| First released | 2016 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Mosh | ngrok |
Why pick each one
Choose Eternal Terminal if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in C++
Choose frp if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 108.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Eternal Terminal or frp better?
Neither is universally better. frp has the larger community, while Eternal Terminal is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Eternal Terminal and frp free and open-source?
Yes. Eternal Terminal is licensed under Apache-2.0 and frp under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Eternal Terminal and frp with Docker?
Eternal Terminal: check the project docs for container support. frp: yes.