frp vs localtunnel

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurefrplocaltunnel
CategoryRemote Access & VPNRemote Access & VPN
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinary, dockerdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 108,622★ 22,440
First released20162015
Replacesngrokngrok

Why pick each one

Choose frp if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 108.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
frp details

Choose localtunnel if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 22.4k GitHub stars
localtunnel details

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or localtunnel better?

Neither is universally better. frp has the larger community, while localtunnel is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are frp and localtunnel free and open-source?

Yes. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and localtunnel under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run frp and localtunnel with Docker?

frp: yes. localtunnel: yes.

Related comparisons